3 ms·

Since when "potentially" is a valid scientific statement, and not a clickbait?

• deleted 9y ago
  [deleted]
• iaw 9y ago
  Read the article, nicotine vapor from e-cigarettes have the potential to cause the same damage to DNA as nicotine from traditional cigarettes depending on the amount of nicotine present and duration of contact. The claim in the title is utterly false because nicotine isn't the only health risk issue with tobacco cigarettes. Essentially the results show that vaporized chemical nicotine can cause the same amount of damage regardless of how the chemical was vaporized. In summary they proved the obvious. Edit: The term 'potential' in the research has a very clear and rigorous meaning, the term 'potential' in the title is clickbait bullshit.
  • deleted 9y ago
    [deleted]
  • deleted 9y ago
    [deleted]
• coldtea 9y ago
  >Since when "potentially" is a valid scientific statement, and not a clickbait? Anytime results are not conclusive but still point towards a certain outcome?