3 ms·
> You really have to wonder how we went from a computer with a bunch of slots and open schematics to one that is so closed you need permission from the manufact
by jonknee 9y ago
> You really have to wonder how we went from a computer with a bunch of slots and open schematics to one that is so closed you need permission from the manufacturer to run whatever code you desire.
Yet look what happened to sales after they debuted the closed hardware and OS. At the end of the day the mass customer prefers devices that are easy to use and hard to break.
I'd personally love an iOS with a little more flexibility, but considering it's a device that knows so much about me I am OK with the trade offs. Things like Apple forcing[1] the location permission option "only while using the app" is awesome for the end user. I end up trying out way more software on iOS than OS X because I have a reasonable expectation that whatever happens I can just delete it in one standard operation.
[1] https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2017/6/7/15757774/ios-11-location-permissions-stricter-uber https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2017/6/7/15757774/io...
- mmastrac 9y ago> Yet look what happened to sales after they debuted the closed hardware and OS. At the end of the day the mass customer prefers devices that are easy to use and hard to break. I don't think the locked-down device had anything to do with this. You could hack the old iPods with custom firmware to do all sorts of fun things and those things were still the most popular devices on the market.
- jonknee 9y agoThere is a huge difference between "you could hack" and the default. In a system that defaults allowing users to get into trouble, most users get themselves into trouble.