i_cant_speel> Not security when there's an apocalypse. One man’s apocalypse is another man’s civil war. I will let the more knowledgable reference history here

i_cant_speel> Not security when there's an apocalypse. One man’s apocalypse is another man’s civil war. I will let the more knowledgable reference history here. On what we’re speaking about: korrachs> I was wondering how long it would take for the attack on the solidarity of the precariat: korrachs> The rich cannot be ruined. I can. taneq> within a year or two you would have far more security than the $30k household will ever have. Although you could argue that I’m cherry picking to make my point, I will so bold as to allude that perhaps we are missing the larger argument here. The solidarity of the precariat under fire is an excellent way to consolidate power amongst the influential. A little something called divide and rule.