>various pomo terms and theories are written about as if there were anything behind them. What do you mean? Because I don't think there's anything wrong with p

>various pomo terms and theories are written about as if there were anything behind them. What do you mean? Because I don't think there's anything wrong with post-modern theory; it's a topic that's actively discussed in philosophy. I think it's unwise to dismiss something just because it's post-modern, it it given credence to post-modernism. Perhaps there is something behind Derrida.