3 ms·
If Wireshark is any example, definitely not. I've not met anyone that likes the Qt version (in VoIP, it's an indispensable tool used all the time) - it seems li
by MichaelGG 9y ago
If Wireshark is any example, definitely not. I've not met anyone that likes the Qt version (in VoIP, it's an indispensable tool used all the time) - it seems like it lost a ton of polish.
- Etzos 9y agoThis is somewhat off-topic, but I'm curious since every person who has had this sentiment that I've known was unable to provide specific parts which were lacking. Do you perhaps have a short list of top things which are missing their polish with the Qt version of Wireshark? I'm just a light user of the tool and am genuinely curious about what things it may have lost in the transition.
- pilif 9y agoI’m I using it for debugging barcode scanners talking to a web service. I much prefer the qt based UI. It’s much faster and obviously feels much more native to the platform
- yjftsjthsd-h 9y ago> more native to the platform For a specific platform, or multiple?
- Kwpolska 9y agoQt works much better than GTK+ on both Windows and macOS. Unlike GTK+, it’s much harder to distinguish a Qt app and a native app for those platforms.
- inferiorhuman 9y agoThe Qt version is miles ahead on OSX since it's no longer a clunky X11 app.