4 ms·
Looks like its down.
by dk8996 9y ago
Looks like its down.
- lern_too_spel 9y agoI read a few paragraphs while it was up. It's just a poorly written hatchet job.
- mirimir 9y agoI don't have an opinion re Rome Viharo vs David Gerard. But I do agree that Wikipedia is a clusterfuck. It seems OK as a source for basic factual stuff. But otherwise, I have no time for it.
- MilkyBar 9y agoHow a forum admin described Rome Viharo before banning him: "Following all this are descriptions of his trolling adventures, which are, as one might expect, kind to forums which fell for his shit, and nasty to those which saw him for the troll he is and banned him." https://archive.is/w924h https://archive.is/w924h He never takes responsibility for his internet disruption/trolling. If you merely quote his Wikipedia & forum bans, he claims he is being "harassed". His issue with his Rationalwiki article is it logs his toxic internet history under his real name. Before people knew his real name, he had no problem admitting he is a troll. He even bragged about it. He didn't though want people to know what mischief he gets up to online; that's his issue with the RW article. Rome Viharo in his own words back in 2011 (that is prior to his real name was connected to his trolling): http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?s=9ae48ef7ed3f572ec527d02d0a548dec&p=7338655#post7338655 http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?s... "haha i was just using a sockpuppet... In case you all have not noticed, I like playing tricks - but I am very open and transparent about that." Admits above to being a trickster (troll) & sockpupeteer, but if you quote that now his real name is connected to these accounts he denies both.
- pwdisswordfish 9y agohttp://archive.is/rx20S http://archive.is/rx20S