3 ms·
>[the fake] is exactly the same as the real thing So what? It doesn't matter if the counterfiet handbags are good fakes, even indistinguishable. Similarly, if
by schiffern 9y ago
>[the fake] is exactly the same as the real thing
So what? It doesn't matter if the counterfiet handbags are good fakes, even indistinguishable. Similarly, if you put counterfeit money in a bank it becomes electronic. The integer values of "fake" and "real" money are completely indistinguishable. But it's still fake money, and when you're caught they'll still take it.
The likes are fake because the thing the integer claims to represent ("people who came across this organically via our site and liked this") is fabricated. Trying to say that it's not fake merely because "someone actually clicked like" is like saying fake product reviews are real because "someone actually filled out and submitted an electronic form."
>The amount isn't the issue here
OP said "as if most of likes were real ones," so obviously they think the amount is [at least part of] the issue.
- achamayou 9y agoInstagram makes no claims about the nature of the "likes", nor their meaning on their website. The only restriction their TOS mentions about "likes" is that they shouldn't be "unwanted" ("aka spam"), there's absolutely nothing about them having to be sincere, permanent, not in exchange for money etc.