3 ms·
Proxmox and Virtuozzo both primarily operate on containers; Proxmox uses LXC and Virtuozzo uses OpenVZ. With things like kernel same-page merging, LVM thin sto
by cookiecaper 9y ago
Proxmox and Virtuozzo both primarily operate on containers; Proxmox uses LXC and Virtuozzo uses OpenVZ.
With things like kernel same-page merging, LVM thin storage pools, and memory ballooning, the difference between "containers" and "VMs" is reducing to the point where the main difference is whether there's a software layer emulating the hardware or not.
Docker is the new kid on the block, and a bonfire of billions of VC dollars can create a lot of smoke.
- mental_ 9y agoYou never disappoint. Thanks!
- njetten 9y agoFWIW: Virtuozzo is the commercial name for OpenVZ (+some commercial tools) and both use the same (their own) implementation for doing cgroups/namespacing
- tyingq 9y agoYes, I probably could have worded it better...the "but" was meant to apply to VMware. Proxmox does both hypervisors and containers though...I wouldn't say primarily containers. But that is a better crowd to specifically compare LXD to, rather than docker. You can mess about and create a docker image to run a full OS, and you can also get LXD/LXC to work for docker use cases. But, you're swimming upstream in doing so.