4 ms·
Google said that they prioritise fast pages, not AMP pages. You can use some other way to make your pages load fast, and it won't make a difference. Unless you
by kartickv 9y ago
Google said that they prioritise fast pages, not AMP pages. You can use some other way to make your pages load fast, and it won't make a difference.
Unless you have solid evidence to the contrary, I see no reason to believe you over believing Google.
- eanzenberg 9y agoDo you work there or something? I've never seen someone so hyped about the 2nd biggest corp in the world.
- kartickv 9y agoRather than respoding to the points I made about AMP, you're focusing on an ad-hominem criticism of me personally. Please stop doing that.
- untog 9y agoIs it really that surprising that Google finds crawling pages stored on their own CDN to be faster than pages stored... anywhere else? They don't even need to leave the Google network.
- risyasin 9y agoI do not really believe that. I have a site which is served way faster than it's Amp version. Obviously Google never really care to check whether original page is faster than AMP. Yes I have numbers. AMP version loads about 400ms. While the original was about 300ms. Almost certain for all pages.
- majewsky 9y agoThat was likely a singular measurement, likely from your notebook. A user at some other location might very much disagree, unless your site has a CDN as extensive as Google.
- JoshMnem 9y agoSee also: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/19/open_source_insider_google_amp_bad_bad_bad/ https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/05/19/open_source_insider... "Pinboard founder Maciej Cegłowski already recreated the Google AMP demo page without the Google AMP JavaScript and, unsurprisingly, it's faster than Google's version."