4 ms·
I've never actually seen AMP "in the wild". Is it because my only mobile browsing is with Firefox on Android?
by abrowne 9y ago
I've never actually seen AMP "in the wild". Is it because my only mobile browsing is with Firefox on Android?
- floatboth 9y agoYeah, same. Firefox Nightly Android + DuckDuckGo, but sometimes I do use Google, still haven't found an AMP page.
- abrowne 9y agoI do use Google, although I don't search for news much. I usually find NYT, Guardian etc articles from their homepages.
- callahad 9y agoThat's because Google sniffs Firefox's user agent and serves it an older, less featureful version of Google Search. One that doesn't support AMP. Spoofing Firefox's ua-string to appear as Chrome will get you the full Search experience, including AMP.
- johnsmith21006 9y agoBut according to some on here a no AMP response with FF is better as no AMP. Which is it? Personally prefer the faster speed with AMP.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- kuschku 9y agoGoogle intentionally serves to Firefox a massively limited version of Google search. Most search features are completely removed, and this also includes AMP. Others are search filters, for example.
- chinathrow 9y ago> Google intentionally serves to Firefox a massively limited version of Google search. This alone should be enough to warrant a close examination of Googles practices, let's say by the EU.