3 ms·
Maybe they are in the US, but in a lot of the world people walk or take transport when it comes to going to the shops. In these places, deliveries would obvious
by CM30 9y ago
Maybe they are in the US, but in a lot of the world people walk or take transport when it comes to going to the shops. In these places, deliveries would obviously have a far higher carbon footprint.
- Retric 9y agoFirst, I am an American and often walk to stores so your mileage may vary. However, items also get shipped to stores so it really depends, but if your walking to the store it's a likely a fairly meaningless difference. Buses are generally considered efficient, but items are often vastly smaller than people which shifts things again. Moving 100+ pound people is simply less efficient than moving sub 1 pound objects. It may come down to packaging which seems to be in favor of going to the store. But, Amazon packaging does not need to look good or be tamper resistant and can thus often avoids using a lot of clear plastic on some items etc. In the end it's a surprisingly complex optimization problem. Made worse when you consider the vast overhead of physical stores which must be cooled/heated/cleaned and have a wide selection on hand etc.