4 ms·
I wouldn't put it that way; it simply means the ROI for a framework is lower, and in Go's case, it's zero or less. It makes perfect sense because Go's syntax se
by weberc2 9y ago
I wouldn't put it that way; it simply means the ROI for a framework is lower, and in Go's case, it's zero or less. It makes perfect sense because Go's syntax servers the same main purpose as a DI framework--to reduce initialization boilerplate.