> Engadget reporting is so … underwhelming for a site with such financial backing. Yeah seriously. I couldn't believe this line: "Backward compatibility means

> Engadget reporting is so … underwhelming for a site with such financial backing. Yeah seriously. I couldn't believe this line: "Backward compatibility means that manufacturers won't have to redesign old systems, either" What does that even mean? That you can take a PCI-e 4.0 device and plug it into an older slot? Isn't that universally the case with computers, otherwise the bus would be called something else... I'm unaware of any hardware vendor that puts effort into redesigning a product they're already shipping, if not to resolve a deficiency (and even then, it'd better be important to re-spin the hardware).