4 ms·
I think part of it is chip & signature vs chip & pin UX because this doesn't seem to be an issue in Europe (I also remember their chip reading being significant
by pfranz 9y ago
I think part of it is chip & signature vs chip & pin UX because this doesn't seem to be an issue in Europe (I also remember their chip reading being significantly faster...but maybe that's an illusion?). There's a story about the Houston airport where people complained that their luggage took too long at the new terminal. They created a longer route for people to walk from the plane to the luggage carousel and the complaints went away.
If I remember correctly, with chip & pin you put in the card, type your pin, then remove your card. With chip & signature you put in your card, wait, after a receipt is printed out (or the screen prompts you) you scribble something that may or may not resemble your name so you can leave.
Personally, I want to use ApplePay/GooglePay but it's slower and more awkward only because I'm not sure if the terminal accepts it. I can get out my wallet and my credit card knowing it'll be accepted. With ApplePay/GooglePay I have to wait, possibly put my wallet away, pull out my phone and pop up the screen.
- 6DM 9y agoI can confirm, chip takes what feels like forever. You put it in and wait for probably 30 seconds until the machine starts making annoying sounds for you to remove the card. With a swipe, half the time when I'm done sliding my card through it's already prompting me for my pin. This time difference occurs at self checkouts so I know it has nothing to do with a cashier. Eventually I figured out using NFC is significantly faster but not everyone has them :(