4 ms·
Hardly. You still need: 1. An in depth understanding of Physics, History, Literature, and Philosophy. You can just make up whatever you want in Economics, Soci
by te_platt 9y ago
Hardly. You still need:
1. An in depth understanding of Physics, History, Literature, and Philosophy. You can just make up whatever you want in Economics, Sociology, and Bitcoins as fits your political leanings.
2. Learn to resist weapons grade grammar analysis.
3. Learn to recognize sarcasm in short, written text.
- roryisok 9y ago> 3. Learn to recognize sarcasm in short, written text. No need. This is HN. Someone's bound to have used machine learning to crack this already.
- thenomad 9y agoWhat we need now is a text-to-speech engine programmed with The Mary Whitehouse Experience's "Man With A Sarcastic Tone Of Voice".
- mbrock 9y agoDuh, haven't you read "Automatic Sarcasm Detection: A Survey" by Joshi, Bhattacharyya and Carman? https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03426 https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03426
- fho 9y agoAnd for a second there I thought that you just made that up :-)
- zhte415 9y agoAnd Chinese or Japanese, especially characters; the argument of material design is much better replaced by everyone learning Chinese characters and just using that. HN is happy to contribute its wisdom to all fields.