4 ms·
"better" wine? https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2013/jun/23/wine-tasting-junk-science-analysis https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2013/jun/23/win
by daxorid 9y ago
"better" wine?
https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2013/jun/23/wine-tasting-junk-science-analysis https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2013/jun/23/wine-ta...
http://www.realclearscience.com/blog/2014/08/the_most_infamous_study_on_wine_tasting.html http://www.realclearscience.com/blog/2014/08/the_most_infamo...
- schwap 9y agoIn the context of the article "better" = tastes most pleasing (to the author)
- ghostDancer 9y agoThat's the best definition of better in this case. I have a friend who is a wine maker(enologist) and he always says the same, the best wine is the one you enjoy not the one some magazine/person/web says. You can but the most expensive wine in the world and do not like it then it doesn't matter if it's good or not.
- graeme 9y agoHave you seen this? http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/05/daily-chart-11 http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2017/05/daily-c... It defies common sense to think all wine is equal quality. The fact that there's much nonsense in the wine world doesn't mean it's all nonsense. We'd need to see much stronger evidence than what has been presented.
- NikolaeVarius 9y agoThey were trying to figure out Grape type and origin country not "quality". And even then was less than 50% accurate.