2 ms·
How is that even relevant to this article? The middle class family described wasn't forced into debt by expensive essentials. It sank into it by living beyond i
by arjie 9y ago
How is that even relevant to this article? The middle class family described wasn't forced into debt by expensive essentials. It sank into it by living beyond its means by overspending on non-essentials.
Nobody made them spend two months income and 60% of their savings on a vacation. That's patently idiotic.
- jacquesm 9y ago> > Canadian spends far more on consumer goods than is probably wise given their income. I think I covered that. The reason they do is because Canadians are very much conditioned (and Americans too) to describe everything they buy in terms of monthly payments. That works, as long as the paychecks keep rolling in. But it does not take much to upset that. As for the infrastructure spending and other bits in that comment: if there were more people carrying the load then everybody would end up a little wealthier. As it is the only place where real money is being made in Canada is in banking, which is almost predatory as to how it treats the population. The interest rates are off the scale compared to the rest of the world and the various low key trade-wars with the US do not help either.