6 ms·
Unlimited is a disaster because of media horders, but 1TB is slightly too small for me (I'm a serious photographer off hours and work from RAW files). I would l
by akeck 9y ago
Unlimited is a disaster because of media horders, but 1TB is slightly too small for me (I'm a serious photographer off hours and work from RAW files). I would love a metered plan, a la S3 but for consumers, that comes out to about $60/y for 2TB for moderate data transfer rates. Then, at the very least, Amazon can do power law scaling for higher users (3TB meters out to $70/y, but 20TB with high transfer comes out to $5000+/year). Then they can slide the metering as storage gets incrementally cheaper. In fact, I would pay $120-$200/y for 2TB if they had a well-supported Linux client.
- Antrikshy 9y agoDropbox Business does 2TB for $12.50/user/month and does have a Linux client, right?
- akeck 9y agoDropbox says: "starting at 3 users"
- ValentineC 9y ago> Unlimited is a disaster because of media horders, but 1TB is slightly too small for me (I'm a serious photographer off hours and work from RAW files). Amazon Cloud Drive's (still-available) Unlimited Photos plan includes RAW files.
- akeck 9y agoThanks for the tip!