3 ms·
The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses might be worth considering, http://opendevice.blogspot.com/2007/06/best-
by jamaicahest 16y ago
The http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_licenses might be worth considering, http://opendevice.blogspot.com/2007/06/best-gnu-gpl-vs-bsd-comparison-ever.html http://opendevice.blogspot.com/2007/06/best-gnu-gpl-vs-bsd-c... provides a decent comparison
- loup-vaillant 16y agoThe comparison you mentioned is dangerous, because it makes a huge mistake: > if you choose to copy and paste GPL code into your own program you have to share it No, no, no and NO. The obligation of licensing your program with the GPL only triggers upon distribution. As long as you keep the program for yourself, you don't have to share anything. Some people chose the BSD licence because they believe this fallacy. Other people say the GPL isn't really free precisely because they believe this fallacy. It's about the 5th time I scream that all over HN. Please pay attention.