There are many valid points raised here, though there is clearly room for argument with every metric. What strikes me about this article is the site and conten

There are many valid points raised here, though there is clearly room for argument with every metric. What strikes me about this article is the site and content itself. Reading this article loads layers upon layers of javascript which collectively download megabytes of content, the vast majority of which is utterly useless crap that contributes absolutely nothing to the experience of reading the article. The intent of this article is to propose some metrics for maturity and capacity of technology development, but careful measure of downloading shows that this site is an abomination beyond reason that shuts out users lacking broadband and fast machines with plenty of memory. If you really want to learn about technology development competence then compare how this page is served compared to a static plain text version of the same content.