3 ms·
Well, my professional experience has been completely different, maybe hardcore research in images is different. At any rate isn't TF already the Rails/ magical
by orthoganol 9y ago
Well, my professional experience has been completely different, maybe hardcore research in images is different. At any rate isn't TF already the Rails/ magical framework of DL, in some sense?
- ericd 9y agoI'm not an expert, but Keras seems much closer than TF.
- espadrine 9y agoThey're complementary. Keras typically uses TF as a back-end, letting users model standard architectures quickly, while TF lets you express new and complex graphs of computation.
- ericd 9y agoI'm aware, I'm using Theano as my backend. I just mean that Keras seems more analogous to Rails than TF - TF would be Ruby in that analogy.
- shadowmint 9y agoI don't know... There's plenty of horrible code out there, particularly tensorflow code, which matches all the classical metrics for 'spaghetti code'. The complexity of the implementation might be hidden away by the framework, but there's no excuse for writing massive hundred+ line functions that do multiple things with copy-pasted code blocks. That's just bad code, in ML or not.