3 ms·
> You assert that the production of cholesterol is not the problem. Since you claim that I am starting from the wrong axiom, what do you believe is the root cau
by nunb 16y ago
> You assert that the production of cholesterol is not the problem. Since you claim that I am starting from the wrong axiom, what do you believe is the root cause of hypercholesterolemia?
The issue is cardiac mortality. I assert cholesterol is not the cause [1]. I further claim that assuming that it is, and orienting research that way, is equivalent to starting from the wrong axiom.
I don't say you particularly start from the wrong axiom, rather that the general approach does.
Your counter is "Since you claim that I am starting from the wrong axiom, what do you believe is the root cause of hypercholesterolemia?"
This is orthogonal because we are not concerned with cholesterol.
Here is a corrected version of the question I assume you meant to ask.
"what do you believe is the root cause of the current sudden cardiac mortality epidemic?"
Answer: carbohydrate/omega-6 induced Metabolic Syndrome.
If this seems like begging the question [2], I will make it plainer: carbohydrate overfeeding coupled with excessive omega-6 consumption. Our bodily mechanisms necessarily mean it will lead to Syndrome X / Type 2 diabetes / early-onset cardiac mortality.
[2] because Metabolic syndrome is so ill-specified as to really be just a combination of symptoms.
[1] except pathological cases above, say 500mg/dl
- carbocation 16y agoDo you have any evidence to support this, or is just an idea? Also, how does your idea square with the fact that cardiac mortality has decreased at the same time that the diet you are blaming has increased?