I support it, but only partially and with caveats. If we are going to regulate service providers then why not limit what content providers can do as well? Why

I support it, but only partially and with caveats. If we are going to regulate service providers then why not limit what content providers can do as well? Why should they get a completely free ride? Here is that NN results in. Permanent protection from competition for internet providers as long as they agree to not be too profitable. In return for having their rates called into question and rate increases reviewed they are protected from having anyone being able to undercut them because those same would be subject to the same rates and rules. Which means, what you got now is what you will have for a long time. NN does not guarantee, in fact it slows, the chance for higher speeds because there won't be competition to deliver such to you. So those are my caveats. I would like to see additional pricing for content providers limited but not at the point they can free ride the net. We are just adding dollars to the content people's wallets and for what? So we can feel good about sticking it to Comcast (which I don't use). This didn't work for railroads or long distance, it took us a century for the former and nearly half for the latter to fix