3 ms·
I'm not sure that this has to do with her being a woman, everyone else on the panel have wikipedia pages while she doesn't. In such a scenario there will obviou
by Klockan 9y ago
I'm not sure that this has to do with her being a woman, everyone else on the panel have wikipedia pages while she doesn't. In such a scenario there will obviously be a power differential irrespective of the genders involved.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Albert https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Albert
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_F._R._Ellis https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_F._R._Ellis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Guth https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Guth
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrei_Linde https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrei_Linde
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Loewer https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barry_Loewer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=Veronika+Hubeny https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=Veronika...
- likelynew 9y agoI think there is some differential. Judging by number of citations, looked by google scholar: George F R Ellis: 30744 Andrei Linde: 56716 Veronika Hubeny: 4874 Barry Loewer: 3431 Alan Guth: >17,317(summed 2 pages in scholar, as he doesn't have a profile there) David Albert: >5062(summed 3 pages in scholar, counting only papers related to quantum mechanics) So there are 3 researchers there whose voice can potentially trump others by a margin, if citations are a good measure.