> it's no less granular than NoScript. Sorry, to clarify, I wasn't comparing uMatrix to NoScript, merely commenting that it didn't seem particularly useful to

> it's no less granular than NoScript. Sorry, to clarify, I wasn't comparing uMatrix to NoScript, merely commenting that it didn't seem particularly useful to me when I tried it. I was considering trying NoScript at some point, but from what you've said, it doesn't sound like it would be much better for my purposes?