3 ms·
I don't know if "competency" is the right word to use. As the OP points out in the "Assumptions", if you have a company with 5 engineers working on completely
by k2xl 9y ago
I don't know if "competency" is the right word to use.
As the OP points out in the "Assumptions", if you have a company with 5 engineers working on completely different codebases, you may make a conscious decision to not be at "level 4" code review status. Doesn't mean you are incompetent it just means you are practical.
A lot of small business operate efficiently by electing to not overly complexify their development process. So maybe instead of "competency" using a word like "sophistication" would be better
- mbesto 9y agoWas going to say the same thing - the maturity is probably better suited than competency.
- fragsworth 9y agoAgreed. I wouldn't feel bad if your <5 person dev team is not following half the things on those lists. It's not practical at all.
- CorvusCrypto 9y agoThe infrastructure one had me chuckle a bit. Just go straight to large clusters or platform service plans guys. 2ezpz