The naming clash is unfortunate, but will at some point become inevitable as more tools doing the same thing (de-duplicating backup in this case) are created.

The naming clash is unfortunate, but will at some point become inevitable as more tools doing the same thing (de-duplicating backup in this case) are created. GitHub does not restrict licensing on their public repositories; I'm not interested in declaring myself a shaman for the "spirit of GitHub" to address that point. http://www.infoworld.com/article/2615869/open-source-software/github-needs-to-take-open-source-seriously.html http://www.infoworld.com/article/2615869/open-source-softwar... I do agree with this part of your post: Not cool. Not cool at all. Either naivety or guerilla growth hacking / marketing; we'll see how things shake out.