4 ms·
Unless you are a sought-after C-level executive, hardly any legitimate companies are going to even consider your "clever hacks." The first one blows up 409a (r
by hobbyjogger 9y ago
Unless you are a sought-after C-level executive, hardly any legitimate companies are going to even consider your "clever hacks."
The first one blows up 409a (requires optionholder to pay fair market value for the shares). As to the second, very, very few investors are going to allow "their" money to be used for a common stock repurchase (at the same per share price) instead of going toward's the company's operations/development/whatever.
- sidlls 9y agoYes, but that's just another asymmetry in the market. Some (many, actually, as far as I can tell) of these "legitimate companies" care very deeply about lower status employees thinking highly of their "clever hacks" regarding equity as part of a compensation package. $X salary plus y% options at a startup should almost always be viewed as a having a value of $X and no more than that, but these "legitimate companies" want employees to view it as $X + $Million(s) in a future (all but guaranteed!) windfall. There are exceptions, but these are rare. I wouldn't take issue with these companies trying to pass their crappy "equity compensation" packages off as "legitimate" if there was more openness and honesty about its value and the status of the employees with respect to the company. The only time anybody should value equity at > $0 is when it's part of a regular grant or purchase of shares with true, market recognized value (e.g. RSU grants, ESP plans in a public company).
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]