>The new version doesn't have those problems. See, that's the thing. It may be much better than before, but starting from such a low level this doesn't mean mu

>The new version doesn't have those problems. See, that's the thing. It may be much better than before, but starting from such a low level this doesn't mean much. Considering the whole Geekbench history I have a hard time accepting that statement in its absolute form. That they suddenly are _the_ indesputable luminaries about all the intricacies, pitfalls and subtleties of multi-arch benchmarking and have done everything right to make a single artificial score a meaningful comparator (which is questionable in itself in the best of cases IMO).