3 ms·
That would be a valid reason to provide a JS alternative depending on context, not so much a valid argument for JS-free alternatives as standard. There will al
by saltedmd5 9y ago
That would be a valid reason to provide a JS alternative depending on context, not so much a valid argument for JS-free alternatives as standard.
There will always be something you can do to reduce power consumption: expecting (or advocating) JS-free versions of all websites for that reason is a completely arbitrary line to draw.