I didn't take notes and don't have a ton of time, but here are some examples: 14:30 - moderator assumes another panelist's position 'surely you're going to tak

I didn't take notes and don't have a ton of time, but here are some examples: 14:30 - moderator assumes another panelist's position 'surely you're going to take issue...' 22:30 - moderator explains another panelist's research for him, for nearly 2 full minutes. Attempts to talk over panelist when panelist starts to speak, but notably the panelist consciously speaks louder and repetitively to cut off the moderator. 26:20 - moderator rambles while ignoring a panelist who raises hand wanting to speak (and then hands the conversation to the female panelist) 31:00 - moderator spends a full minute 'explaining' a panelist's philosophy completely incorrectly, before panelist says the summary is incorrect and corrects. 38:00 - moderator rambles about definitions of inflation, asks a cosmologist to explain, cosmologist explains, moderator isn't satisfied and explains more about different definitions of inflation, asks cosmologist to explain better than he did before. The moderator is simply a dominant personality who wants to play a central role in the conversation rather than moderate it.