5 ms·
Having browsed nearly JS-free for the last two-ish years, aside from a bit of tweaking at the start, I have to say that it has made things a lot faster, more st
by WorkLobster 9y ago
Having browsed nearly JS-free for the last two-ish years, aside from a bit of tweaking at the start, I have to say that it has made things a lot faster, more stable, and just much more of a pleasure to navigate. If anyone is interested, I have found that two tools make life a lot easier:
- NoScript, which blocks execution of scripts save for those you whitelist. This means sites that reasonably require JS (e.g. YouTube, Google Maps) can remain functional.
- A bookmarklet that redirects you to the Google text-only cache of the current page, which is great for text-based articles that inexplicably require JS to show content.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- pmlnr 9y agoWould you mind sharing that bookmarklet?
- WorkLobster 9y agoSure: javascript:(function()%7Bvar%20loc%3Dwindow.location%3Bif%20(window.location.protocol%20!%3D%20%22https%3A%22)%7Bloc%3Dwindow.location.toString().replace(%2F%5Ehttp%3A%5C%2F%5C%2F%2F%2C'http%3A%2F%2Fwebcache.googleusercontent.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dcache%3A')%3B%7Delse%7Bloc%3Dwindow.location.toString().replace(%2F%5Ehttps%3A%5C%2F%5C%2F%2F%2C'https%3A%2F%2Fwebcache.googleusercontent.com%2Fsearch%3Fq%3Dcache%3A')%3B%7Dwindow.location.replace(loc%20%2B%20'%26num%3D1%26strip%3D1%26vwsrc%3D0')%7D)() Glancing at it, it just seems to drop the webcache URL in front of the current page location. Credit to http://www.localseoguide.com/easily-check-the-text-only-cache-of-a-page/ http://www.localseoguide.com/easily-check-the-text-only-cach..., if I recall correctly.
- bitwize 9y agoNoScript doesn't actually work half the time; even when you whitelist a site through it the site could well remain busted. Source: bitter experience.
- asfdsfggtfd 9y agoPresumably this occurs when the site uses a CDN for their js libraries (or even their main js). After a few days you start to spot which domains need to be enabled and which can be safely ignored.
- flukus 9y agoCan you whitelist a CDN but only for a specific site?
- ratherbefuddled 9y agoDepends on your blocker. uBlock Origin does this well.
- digi_owl 9y agoBest i recall, even if you whitelist a CDN it only comes into action if you whitelist the root domain of the site you are visiting. Beyond that i guess there is GRE, where you can build "firewall" rules. For example i have Facebook blocked via it unless i visit Facebook.com directly, thus they don't see me browsing all manner of sites via their like buttons and comment boxes.
- kwhitefoot 9y agoWhere can we get the bookmarklet from?
- atriix 9y agouMatrix [0] "Point and click matrix to filter net requests according to source, destination and type" is also nice. 0: https://github.com/gorhill/uMatrix https://github.com/gorhill/uMatrix
- Zenbit_UX 9y agoMy main issue with having no script on is for website checkouts. Especially when buying flight tickets. A lot of sites will introduce new scripts in the middle of a stepper that you didn't need to complete step 1. Now you can't submit step 2 or 3 and when you allow the new scripts the page reloads and you lose all your form data.