3 ms·
Good point. I think that probably gets more of a pass because we used to have a lot of inline JS in the past. Doing it the other way was a lot sloppier before
by exclusiv 9y ago
Good point. I think that probably gets more of a pass because we used to have a lot of inline JS in the past.
Doing it the other way was a lot sloppier before because HTML was such a chore to include in JS.