3 ms·
While I understand your argument, your anecdote lacks causality. That fancy new high rise was coming now matter how what McDonald's was paying.
by Naritai 9y ago
While I understand your argument, your anecdote lacks causality. That fancy new high rise was coming now matter how what McDonald's was paying.
- matthewmarkus 9y agoWell, the Starbucks next door is still there, so one business was able to pass on its costs, the other was not. Also, the McDonald's mainly served the elderly and those on fixed incomes, so clearly their customer base wasn't going to pay the price of a latte for a cheeseburger. Admittedly, though, it is just an anecdote.
- pkamb 9y agoIf you're talking about First Hill, you're comparing a single story standalone McDonalds in a neighborhood of highrises to a Starbucks taking up a single retail storefront in a full-block hospital complex. Not quite equivalent real estate.
- matthewmarkus 9y agoYes, that McDonald's was fighting an uphill battle.