3 ms·
I posited that laws should be reviewed after X years and if there was not a compelling reason (with proof) to continue them then they would lapse. This would ho
by runamok 9y ago
I posited that laws should be reviewed after X years and if there was not a compelling reason (with proof) to continue them then they would lapse. This would hopefully ensure that only really useful laws would even be bothered to be created.
California with its props is a whole other ball of wax... :-)