4 ms·
> How about paying what it's worth for labor instead of expecting to get 'cheap' labor? Sure! but will you rent a place that is $500 expensive while bringing n
by jaggi1 9y ago
> How about paying what it's worth for labor instead of expecting to get 'cheap' labor?
Sure! but will you rent a place that is $500 expensive while bringing no additional benefit other than it employed someone at higher wages ?
- thriftwy 9y agoWhen I was doing renovation at my place, I think I could go for much cheaper labor. Deadlines will likely slip, tho, as quality of work. I would perhaps end up paying more for worse result. Try to pay as much as feasible for the actual work, as few as possible for overhead. You end up paying extra for 'cheap' labor anyway, in the form of higher taxes for those who have to pay them, that includes you. Less transparent economy leads to what is discussed in parent article. All what 'cheap' labor does is lining the pockets of middle men selling this snake oil. With your money.
- irixusr 9y agoYes. Well no, because of lack of general availability. But I pay extra for many things to avoid certain corporate behaviour. In a free market, that's my right. We're trying to wean ourselves off of Amazon, in fact, but we're a one-car family, and Prime is an amazing service.
- webnrrd2k 9y agoThere is very often is an additional benefit. It just isn't directly to you. Isn't that what minimum wage is all about? And disability, social security, and public education? There are lots of benefits to these programs, but the benefits often go directly to someone else, and indirectly back to whoever paid for them. Also, I think a lot of problems come from paying the cheapest possible price, rather that paying for value. An over-focus on short-term profits causes a lot of long-term issues.