9 ms·
How To Become a Millionaire In Three Years
- jasonlbaptiste 16y agoAdded some things, cleaned up a tiny bit, and made permanent this comment which people found useful last night: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1447428 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1447428 Update: seems mediatemple is going schizo, so if things are loading slow, I apologize. They usually run smooth at this level of traffic.
- gbk 16y agoso reposting people's comments as new content for your blog?
- jasonlbaptiste 16y agoIt's actually my comment.
- ismarc 16y agoAnd one that gains a lot from formatting beyond what HN provides. I was only able to skim the comment last night, but was able to sit and read the entire blog post with improved formatting.
- jasonlotito 16y agoThanks for editing your comment and posting it. It's much nicer to read. And... > Raise Revenue, Not Funding Thank you, thank you, thank you. > Look For Something That Is Required Or Subsidized By Law I'd like to add that you should be careful about something that requires you to need constant permission from a third party. The iPhone market is a good example. While I'm not suggesting that you shouldn't develop for that market, you just need to be aware that whatever you do, your success depends on someone besides you or your potential customer saying "Yes."
- jasonlbaptiste 16y agoHoly crap, how did I forget your last point? I'm going to update with that when mediatemple is more stable (making edits seems to screw with the db) with credit to you. That's really important. Regulated industries with constant permission from a third party are things to try to stay away from. That can often intersect with "look for something that is required or subsidized by law".
- earl 16y agoHaving worked on an FDA approved device, may I be the first to say STAY AWAY. I understand the rationale -- I look around at the sort of software every job except one I've worked at produces and am literally terrified of the idea of that software being the basis of medical decisions. The one place I felt built OK software had a nearly one to one ratio of qa to software developers. Nonetheless, having the FDA approve every software update is beyond frustrating, slow, and extremely expensive. Few things suck more than hearing people complain about bugs you fixed a year ago when you can't distribute updates to them until they get approved. On the other hand -- I've seen software from an employer I won't name that informed a Dr that his patient was not pregnant. Which was good since the patient is male. And not postop male, but bio male. You see a few visible fuckups like this and get awfully skittish.
- nlh 16y agoVERY good point. I call this the "fallacy of control" ... Basically, don't forget who controls the product/service/platform you're trying to build for or sell. The prime example of this is Pandora's epic journey through the annals of the music industry. Brilliant idea, brilliant execution, but almost didn't make it because they didn't actually have any control over the product they were selling (other peoples' music). I've seen lots of companies start and fail trying to do similar things -- music, movies, TV shows, etc. So many ideas can be so simple ... "we'll create this awesome service that lets you pick your song and XYZ" Or, more simply put: Be in control of your own supply chain.
- jasonlotito 16y ago> Fallacy of Control I like this. I'm going to steal it for my own personal use in later conversations, where I will forget to credit it to you, Mr/Mrs NLH.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- 0nly1ife 16y ago> If it’s a mass market “trend” that’s all over the news, it’s too late If someone thinks it is a good idea, you are too late. - Yvon Chouinard
- ddemchuk 16y agoYour font isn't very easy on the eyes...drop it down a few notches in size
- jasonlbaptiste 16y agoagreed. Will update it later when mediatemple is more stable. thanks for the feedback.
- rama_vadakattu 16y agountil then you can use Readability bookmarklet http://lab.arc90.com/experiments/readability/ http://lab.arc90.com/experiments/readability/
- nearestneighbor 16y ago> Smart people whom are successful usually got there by doing the same and have an innate desire to help those do the same. Most smart people know not to overuse the dative form.
- zackattack 16y agoThere's no need to be obnoxious, you can just tell him that he should have used who instead of whom. If you wanted to be extra neighborly, you could have provided a cool rule of thumb for gauging when to use which, suggest as "Try substituting him or he; him corresponds with whom whereas he corresponds with who."
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- pragmatic 16y agoAre you in fact a millionaire?
- ryanwaggoner 16y agoYeah, I wasn't sure exactly how to ask this without sounding snarky, but I do think it's a valid point. If you're not, or if you are but didn't make it in three years, I still think the info you offer is valuable, but it doesn't come from the same well of experience as someone who has done it.
- vaksel 16y agodon't think so. I know he has a social network for families with Mark Bao and an app store for business apps. But at most those are 10-50K a year businesses...at least in the foreseeable future.
- ErrantX 16y agoHe has a couple more past businesses too. I'm not sure it matters though; he knows how to make money. The only real difference is volume.
- chc 16y agoAnybody with a minimum-wage job knows how to make money. Volume is a pretty big difference.
- ErrantX 16y agoThey are earning, which is a completely different thing. If it is easier to parse replace money with wealth in my original post.
- ryanwaggoner 16y agoIn the context of "how to make a lot of money in a short time period", volume is pretty much the key differentiator.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- phoenix24 16y agocan't access the article, seems to have been removed/deleted ?
- yanilkr 16y agoI have a brilliant idea, But for this to work, one has to be a billionaire.
- zandorg 16y agoGet on the phone with Michael Milken and raise a few $100 million by selling junk bonds to eager investors if your idea is high-growth (note: he's banned from the industry but it's how a few billionaires got started).
- GavinB 16y agoI'm getting "No Results Found. The page you requested could not be found. Try refining your search, or use the navigation above to locate the post." It seems appropriate. Though I suppose every millionaire became a millionaire in three years, if you only start counting from three years before they became a millionaire.
- rodh257 16y agoHi Jason, Great post, but just thought I'd mention I went searching for the RSS button on your site and couldn't find it anywhere (in fact, I subscribed to the comments on that post in my reader before I realized it was the wrong feed). I could be blind, but in the end I noticed it was Wordpress so went to /rss/ to subscribe. Just thought I'd let you know!
- paolomaffei 16y agoI'm not asking about being digg proof, but not even HN proof?
- babyboy808 16y agoFrom the person who asked this question on HN, I thank you Jason for making this blog post. All the best!
- yewweitan 16y agoWhy do Projections always try to be linear? :http://scrivle.com/2010/06/22/why-do-projections-try-to-be-linear/ http://scrivle.com/2010/06/22/why-do-projections-try-to-be-l...
- pmichaud 16y agoBecause no one is any good at math.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- ww520 16y agoI am, mostly through saving and real estate investment.
- sourc3 16y agoWould you still follow the same strategy in the current real-estate market?
- theprodigy 16y agoJason is for sure not a millionaire, but in his article he just outlines some good tips on how to identify an opportunity.
- koeselitz 16y agoI think this is a really useful article, and honestly the advice sounds like good and rational advice. So I hope it's clearly that I'm genuinely not snarking when I say this: Why would one want to be a millionaire? This isn't to say that there's no reason to try. It's only to say that most people don't think about how much it costs to become a millionaire. Maybe some things are just worth more...
- kingkawn 16y agoDo something that makes $333,333.33 a year.
- JacobAldridge 16y agoAnd end up a penny short. Oh, the disappointment.
- kingkawn 16y agogotta keep something to strive for.
- patio11 16y agoJust a quick semi-meta comment: if you have a comment which you put a lot of time into and which resonated with people, strongly consider blowing it up into a blog post. It may be irrational, but the perceived authority of 500 words wrapped in an attractive Wordpress template murders the perceived authority of 500 words appearing at the third level of indentation on this page. I like to think that I've written some fairly useful stuff here over the last year or so. To the best of my knowledge, none of my comments has ever gone to Slashdot and the New York Times, but the comment that I turned into a blog post about programmers and names just did. Your own blog is also a little easier to cite in resume-type situations. (Hypothetically assuming I were to seek funding, I have at least one HN comment that I'd point to to say "Read this, it is strongly indicative of the future success of the business you are about to invest in", and that is a little quirky.)
- Sukotto 16y agoAnother meta comment: Let me start by saying I do not think you have deliberately abused the HN point system. You already have a high score and presumably don't care about the number growing. That being said... this is an interesting way to game one's HN score. Comment on stories. Once it became obvious that a particular comment is popular/well-received (200+ points) clarify it a bit and post it to your blog. Then submit it as a story back to HN and get another (200+ points). I found your original comment really interesting and the formatting on your blog way easier on the eyes than HN comments so I'm not complaining or anything.... just thought it an interesting (and inadvertent) example of how to abuse the HN point system.
- jasonlbaptiste 16y agoI don't care about Karma at this point in the same way people with lots of money don't care about money (that right there is a potential post). I'd rather not lose it because that means I've done something bad/not smart. Otherwise gaining karma isn't something I keep track of. My logic was: a) I wrote the comment randomly on a Sunday night. I literally wrote what was on my mind. I kept updating it frequently as I thought of more things. b) All of a sudden there were 200+ upvotes the next day. To me that indicated that people found the comment really useful. c) I had more to say, wanted to polish it up, and put it on my blog in a more permanent place. d) Submitted it since it was previously proven to be useful.
- nir 16y agoOnce I saw an article on "How to Get a Rich Girl" one of these Maxim type magazines. I wonder if there were actually people reading it and thinking "yeah, I'm gonna read this and get me a rich chick!"
- ComputerGuru 16y agoPlease don't take this wrong way, but: GAAAH my eyes! The text is way too big, the margins way too wide, and the letters way too run-together. (Readability ftw!)
- getonit 16y ago> letters way too run-together Keming!
- ComputerGuru 16y agoFor those downvoting: it's a joke :D kerning == the way characters are drawn/rendered with their ligatures, etc, if badly kerned ------> keming.
- jasonlbaptiste 16y agoNo no, I won't. I tried optimizing the blog for the iPad a few weeks back. It works great there, but it's not the best for the actual computer. I'm going to scrap the current design and go with something fresher now that I'm writing more often. The iPad formatting? More on that later...
- ComputerGuru 16y agoThanks for your reply. Can't you detect if it's an iPad and use a different stylesheet or is that not possible? (don't know - I'm a mac user, but I'm not sold on the iPad).
- jasonlbaptiste 16y agoYou can certainly detect the user agent. Working on something a bit more in-depth than that though :). I'd say go for it, but it really depends person to person. It's not perfect for everyone.
- mikeklaas 16y ago