> what we say is not always accurate or worthwhile Comments that are inaccurate or worthless can be voted down. An increasing number of low quality links has n

> what we say is not always accurate or worthwhile Comments that are inaccurate or worthless can be voted down. An increasing number of low quality links has no real cost to the submitters but it has real cost to the quality of the site. Right now there is nothing to stop the number of low quality submissions from continuing to grow. I don't think invites or membership is the answer. The challenge is to be open and high-quality. How would treating karma like currency exacerbate the situation?