4 ms·
"Now, if a half of those projects decide to spend 1-2-3 human days to go through the pain of upgrading to the next major version, how much do you think this cos
by informatimago 9y ago
"Now, if a half of those projects decide to spend 1-2-3 human days to go through the pain of upgrading to the next major version, how much do you think this costs the industry collectively? [...] We're talking about a mind blowing $20-40M in industry wide damages. Let me repeat this for you. This mess costed us collectively tenths of millions of dollars to sort it out."
So if a mere botched release costs the users 20 to 40 millions, how comes there's no way to move money toward the freedom software developers so they may hire testers and quality assurance people (and perhaps pay themselves so they can develop during the day, instead of tired, after work) and thus avoid botching releases?
- janesconference 9y agoNot only. This phrase seems to suggest that, if the industry is dependent on my code (without directly paying me for it), I am in some ways responsible of the costs they incur if I decide to ruin, kill or modify it. Nobody would ever write OSS if that was the case.