5 ms·
Why not caffe2? And why mention libsvm, are we in the 90s?
by mtw 9y ago
Why not caffe2? And why mention libsvm, are we in the 90s?
- wodenokoto 9y agoBecause SVM is fast and more than good enough for most problems.
- eggie5 9y agoI think he's talking about libsvm, the c++ package
- wodenokoto 9y agoIt's there because they want to include SVM. So, same answer.
- ska 9y agoAnd why mention libsvm, are we in the 90s. This is quite an odd question. It's not like CNNs entirely cover the same problem domain well. So why wouldn't you want SVM support?