I assumed all along that the reason for their unacceptance was the "speech which displays a lack of maturity", but this is also inconsistent with the value of f

I assumed all along that the reason for their unacceptance was the "speech which displays a lack of maturity", but this is also inconsistent with the value of free speech. Even though their official view on free speech might be deliberately vague, this doesn't seem to be the attitude displayed by the Harvard community who (in my observation) have taken a more traditional and Berkeleyan philosophy. Even if Harvard's action isn't hypocritical, it's still permissible and reasonable to criticize them for behaving in a manner incongruent with the value of free speech, even though they believe restricted speech is free speech.