4 ms·
Yeah, even on that fair; jpg-unfriendly example jpeg still clearly beats flif above 22kb. And below 22kb - sure, FLIF is less bad, but it's still unusable. Al
by emn13 9y ago
Yeah, even on that fair; jpg-unfriendly example jpeg still clearly beats flif above 22kb. And below 22kb - sure, FLIF is less bad, but it's still unusable. Also, the examples below 22kb are a little unfair to most codecs in practice, since you'd get far better results by downscaling first.