I do not share your view at all. Perhaps having a diverse point from yours, will be labeled a 'hate speech' or some other form of left-propaganda-consistent la

I do not share your view at all. Perhaps having a diverse point from yours, will be labeled a 'hate speech' or some other form of left-propaganda-consistent labeling. I hope not, however. US citizens just elected the best choice of the leader, that will stop blatant misuse of US's foreign intelligence services. That will stop one-sided indoctrination of the kids in public schools. The president, that will protect American IT workers from unfair global competition in their own local market space. And a president, that will finally do what he was promising to do.. I bet it is refreshing for folks that voted for him. I also hope, but this is far fetched, that he will get USA out of supporting UN [0]. While I am very much for a number of goals that UN is meant to achieve, the current organization is a disgrace. So if you think that being monitored and unmasked without reason by CIA or FBI -- is your civil right, then, yes, you are out of luck with Trump. Back to the original topic, I would stand with the defendant in this case. Any data initially collected by a centralized service provider, (when the person of interest was not, yet a suspect), for technical purposes of running a service, cannot be used for marketing, criminal investigation or anything else. [0] https://www.sott.net/article/314600-Operating-like-thugs-Independent-journalist-investigating-UN-corruption-has-press-accreditation-revoked-and-is-banned-from-UN https://www.sott.net/article/314600-Operating-like-thugs-Ind...