>> that no matter how good the argument is, it won't beat a bad one. What kind of absurd, nihilist nonsense is this? Sounds like yet another example of Trump's

>> that no matter how good the argument is, it won't beat a bad one. What kind of absurd, nihilist nonsense is this? Sounds like yet another example of Trump's opponents being unable to think critically and assuming their attempt at forcing terrible policy down the throats of common people is a "good argument" against the threat of facism. Trump is winning precisely because there's no "good alternative", 99% of all "alternatives" are just less shitty, and even then only less shitty for certain segments of the population. People never resort to facism with good alternatives, yet strangely it's the default whenever they're stuck with a shit sandwich. But I mean only all of history repeats this lesson, not like we'd expect anyone to understand that or anything.