3 ms·
Bloomberg.com is great at giving you rubbish quickly. The WSJ is better at giving you good information for a fee. Depends on what you want to optimize for, I su
by arjie 9y ago
Bloomberg.com is great at giving you rubbish quickly. The WSJ is better at giving you good information for a fee. Depends on what you want to optimize for, I suppose.
- H4CK3RM4N 9y agoAre you really going to argue that Bloomberg, the one which is able to make Bloomberg Terminal[1] a good value proposition, is worse in terms of quality of information than the Washington Post? [1] https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/solution/bloomberg-terminal/ https://www.bloomberg.com/professional/solution/bloomberg-te...
- arjie 9y ago> Are you really going to argue that Bloomberg, the one which is able to make Bloomberg Terminal[1] a good value proposition, is worse in terms of quality of information than the Washington Post? No, because I don't read the Washington Post and I don't see why it's relevant. But yes, I do claim that bloomberg.com is a poor source of news. Bloomberg.com is to the Bloomberg Terminal as the Amazon Fire Phone is to AWS. Sure, the same company makes both, but one is rubbish and the other is something professionals use all the time.