3 ms·
> So you missed the part of the post where I said "Video right holders have never allowed their content to be delivered without copy protections."? No, but I k
by CaptSpify 9y ago
> So you missed the part of the post where I said "Video right holders have never allowed their content to be delivered without copy protections."?
No, but I kind of ignored it as that argument is irrelevant. What they've always done has no bearing on the situation. It was illogical then, and it's illogical now. Nothing has changed.
Yeah, they are compatible with more systems, but at the cost of screwing up the standard. Just because it's no longer tied to Silverlight is irrelevant. None of that refutes any of my arguments. They could just throw their weight around release the videos DRM free and be done with it, but they choose not to.
- scarface74 9y agoNo, but I kind of ignored it as that argument is irrelevant. What they've always done has no bearing on the situation So I might want to adjust my comment even though you admittedly ignored what I said and the context I said it in? Saying it's illogical to put DRM on content because it can be broken is just as illogical as saying it is illogical to lock your car door because a thief can break the window. What "weight" does Netflix have against the entire movie and music industry?
- CaptSpify 9y agoYour misquote of what I said finally got me to realize how strongly you've been trolling. Good game.