2 ms·
Race wasn't protected in the fifties either, and yet few would argue that it only became oppressive when the laws were changed. Those who would support your arg
by weberc2 9y ago
Race wasn't protected in the fifties either, and yet few would argue that it only became oppressive when the laws were changed. Those who would support your argument are the very same you would evict from your holy hill!
- eropple 9y agoIf racist jerks end up actually oppressed instead of having to deal with the consequences of their very specific and very active choices (which stand in stark contrast to the genetic/external-social of "race"), I am entirely and one hundred percent onboard with having a conversation about whether society is made better by considering them a protected class. I will not hold my breath on either the likelihood of that oppression nor on whether society is made better by enabling them. Do you have an actual argument, or are you just whatabouting?
- weberc2 9y agoI gave my argument, you responded to it with an incorrect nitpick, I corrected you, you tried to dig your way out, and here we are now.