4 ms·
"Private" seems to have a very different meaning in 2017 from what it did in 1987, e.g. I think that people are mistaken when they believe that they can have p
by wyldfire 9y ago
"Private" seems to have a very different meaning in 2017 from what it did in 1987, e.g.
I think that people are mistaken when they believe that they can have private electronic conversations. Even in-person conversations are mildly suspect. If you're a part of a social media group where you don't know every single person in the group, or you are not certain whether newly invited members of the group can see old messages, you should assume this content will get published by a news agency. "How would it look to my boss, my parents and all my friends and family if they were to read what I'm about to write?"
We can mull about technical solutions to this problem and social solutions too. But as frustrating as it is, I believe that this is a net benefit to society. We've rooted out a lot of corrupt individuals with this same sea of audio/video sensors. We must now adjust to the reality that our electronic conversations have a very high likelihood of being leaked.