4 ms·

I use and like Reveal.js but admittedly I sometimes question whether it is the right approach. I try more and more to make my presentations most visual, and to

I use and like Reveal.js but admittedly I sometimes question whether it is the right approach. I try more and more to make my presentations most visual, and too often I end up spending too much time in the CSS fighting Reveal.js (which tries to center everything and do auto-scaling, which is nice in general, but a pain when you need a more custom layout). Currently I end up just doing a lot of the graphics in Inkscape, splitting the layers into multiple SVG files (one per layer) using a script I found, and then assembling it together in Reveal.js using fragments. This technique I used most in one of my latest talks: https://sinusoid.es/talks/immer-meetup17 https://sinusoid.es/talks/immer-meetup17 Now I wonder if maybe I just want to use something like Keynote... but I only use GNU/Linux and try to live in a mostly libre environment. Maybe Impress is good enough?

accordionclown 9y ago
your presentation was visually interesting. it was also a bit slow to load, on my machine anyway, maybe due to my typical dozens of tabs in dozens of windows... but i'd explore whether the .svg approach was the offender. of course, lethargy won't have any impact in the course of actually presenting the thing to an audience, but there is much value to be gained by the after-the-fact mounting of a presentation on the web for later consumption by others, who will thumb through the slideshow at a much faster pace. this is also why a presentation full of bullet-point slides, void of the accompanying speech, is not very compelling. so even if your show does end up being a little bit slower, i think that's offset completely by your step-up in design.
- arximboldi 9y ago
  Thanks for the feedback! I think most of the loading time is in the images, gifs and web fonts used (the svg a bit, but not so much). These days I don't see much of value in optimizing the slides for after-the-fact consumption (video is much better for that), and I just put them online so people that have actually seen the talk can go back to some of the code, links and references. And in this way I justify my lazyness for not optimizing the load time a little bit :)

accordionclown 9y ago

your presentation was visually interesting. it was also a bit slow to load, on my machine anyway, maybe due to my typical dozens of tabs in dozens of windows... but i'd explore whether the .svg approach was the offender. of course, lethargy won't have any impact in the course of actually presenting the thing to an audience, but there is much value to be gained by the after-the-fact mounting of a presentation on the web for later consumption by others, who will thumb through the slideshow at a much faster pace. this is also why a presentation full of bullet-point slides, void of the accompanying speech, is not very compelling. so even if your show does end up being a little bit slower, i think that's offset completely by your step-up in design.

arximboldi 9y ago
Thanks for the feedback! I think most of the loading time is in the images, gifs and web fonts used (the svg a bit, but not so much). These days I don't see much of value in optimizing the slides for after-the-fact consumption (video is much better for that), and I just put them online so people that have actually seen the talk can go back to some of the code, links and references. And in this way I justify my lazyness for not optimizing the load time a little bit :)