> capable of being monitored when there was a reasonable > suspicion of a crime about to be committed. The thing is: they knew about the Manchester attacker,

> capable of being monitored when there was a reasonable > suspicion of a crime about to be committed. The thing is: they knew about the Manchester attacker, and today on BBC was also a report that law enforcement was informed about one of the London attackers. If they cannot act on the intelligence they already have what's the point of diluting it with even more data?